Gedare-Csphd

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 30 May 2013

Congratulations RTEMS GSoC 2013 Students

Posted on 06:25 by Unknown
Congratulations to the accepted students in GSoC 2013 for the RTEMS Project! We had many fine applicants again this year, and were able to accept 9 students to do projects with us this summer. In alphabetical order by project name, we accepted these students/projects:
  • Shubham Somani
    • Application Configuration GUI for RTEMS.
  • Deng Hengyi
    • Atomic Operations and SMP lock debug tool for RTEMS
  • Dhananjay M Balan
    • Better debugging support for RTEMS in GDB.
  • Hesham Moustafa AL-matary
    • Enhance low-level API of libmm (Memory Protection & Caches)
  • Philipp E
    • Paravirtualization layer in RTEMS
  • Jin Yang
    • Porting CAN driver, LinCAN, to RTEMS
  • Peng Fan
    • RTEMS Runtime Loader
  • Sree Harsha Konduri
    • SMP Aware Scheduler
  • Vipul Nayyar
    • Unified APIs
These are all important, ambitious projects that will be of great benefit to RTEMS if successful, and will definitely teach the students a lot about project management and open source development.
Read More
Posted in GSoC, RTEMS | No comments

Thursday, 9 May 2013

Who's calling me? Visualizing function callers

Posted on 10:04 by Unknown
My problem today was to determine and visualize the set of functions (callers) that call another set of functions (callees). For this purpose, I knew the callees function names all started with the same word, say "Callee", and that none of the caller's names start with Callee. For C programs, namespaces are often formed by a coding convention that specifies the format of function names and groups related functions by a common "first name".

I found a simple tool, egypt, that relies on gcc and GraphViz to generate a visualization of a program's static call graph. A call graph is a natural way to visualize what I need, but my requirements are slightly different than the usual. Normally a call graph will include all of the directed edges from callers to callees in an entire program or subset of its functions. What I need is just the nodes of immediate callers of the Callee functions, that is, the subgraph induced by the caller and callee vertices in the call graph.

For my needs, the tool lacks the ability to specify a set of vertices and generate the subgraph they induce. The induced subgraph could be found if I could:
  • specify terminal nodes (callees)
  • filter nodes that do not have an edge to terminal nodes
Rather than implement this ability, I realized I could wrap egypt with a bit of shell code to produce the graph(s) I want.

egypt processes RTL dumps produced by gcc. It outputs a call graph for the RTL dump files passed in. The first thing to do then is to compile the project to visualize using gcc with the -fdump-rtl-expand flag. This produces the *.expand files required by egypt. My first attempt was using gcc 4.4.7, which dumps all of the .expand files in the root directory of the build. For projects with multiple source files having the same name, the .expand files overwrite each other. I switched to gcc 4.7.1 because it dumps the .expand files in the same directory as the .o files are generated. Then, I revisited some old tricks to gather the .expand files into a separate directory for analysis while keeping the project's directory structure.

Now, if I just wanted the callgraph of the Callees, I could easily grep for the .expand files containing functions that start with Callee and pass them to egypt. However, to get the subgraph of caller->Callee is trickier. What I did was to use egypt on each of the .expand files individually and filter the output for edges to a Callee. This gives exactly the set of nodes and edges I need. Then I just need to wrap the output similarly to how egypt does to produce a graph file for GraphViz. The resulting script looks something like,
#!/bin/bash
echo "digraph callgraph {"
files=`find . -name "*.expand"`
for f in $files
do
  egypt --include-external $f | grep Callee_ \
        | grep -v Callee_.*-\> | grep -v Callee_.*\"\;
done
echo "}"
The --include-external is necessary to force egypt to produce caller nodes for which it does not find a definition. The second line of greps are to exclude any calls originating from Callee, and to discard any uncalled Callee. Redirect the output of the script to a file, say callgraph.dot, and then it can be processed with one of the layout engines in the dot tools, like
$> dot -Teps -o callgraph-neato.eps callgraph.dot

 
As an example, I processed the RTEMS Supercore Scheduler package. For this package, the Callee is _Scheduler. I processed the output with the circo drawing filter.
Supercore Scheduler Callers, with Scheduling Functions filled in Grey

Some further improvements could be made. It might also be interesting to visualize the paths (open walks) that end at the Callees. Also, the egypt tool works only on the static call graph, so indirect function calls e.g. through function pointers are not captured. Making use of dynamic profiling tools that generate a call graph, such as gprof or callgrind, could improve the accuracy of the visualization.

Read More
Posted in hacking, visualization | No comments

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

Software Licenses with RTEMS

Posted on 13:55 by Unknown

The RTEMS license is a modified version of the GPL version 2 that includes an exception to permit including headers and linking against RTEMS object files statically. Normally, the GPL can only be linked statically with other GPL code, or rather, linking statically with GPL code would cause your code to become GPL code. The LGPL is not a suitable alternative, because it either requires use of a shared library that can be re-linked, or release of the linked (application) code. And newer versions (GPL version 3) are completely unsuitable for embedded systems due to the relinking restriction which is technically challenging.

A problem for RTEMS is there are no copyleft licenses that are compatible with the RTEMS license. Thus, RTEMS Project has to reject any code that uses the GPL or LGPL, even though RTEMS seems to use the GPL itself---this is because of the exception for static linking, and also because an upstream GPL version 2 project could at any time switch to GPL version 3 and become totally unusable. In practice, RTEMS can only accept original code contributed under the RTEMS License and code that has a permissive license.

I could not find any license that provides the copyleft protection of a software project while still allowing static linking of proprietary software. Maybe there is some subtle legal or technical issue that I do not understand, but it seems like such a license ought to exist somewhere that protects the free software while permitting applications to use it; a sort-of "Embedded GPL".

Some things that RTEMS could do better include:
  • Collect all of the copyright and license disclaimers for users
  • Collect all of the advertising restrictions, or move those encumbered files to a secondary repository
  • Switch from the GPL + linking exception, but to what I do not know
Update 5/8/13: Identified that RTEMS uses version 2 of the GPL, and give some background on why RTEMS has not and will never switch to version 3.

Read More
Posted in open source software, RTEMS | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Generating interrupts with a gem5 device
    Today I extended my work of adding a device to gem5 by causing the device to generate an interrupt. Interrupts seem to be architecture-spec...
  • RTEMS Modular Task Scheduler
    As I mentioned in my last post , this past summer I participated in the Google Summer of Code by working on the RTEMS project. I have hopef...
  • Extensible Data Structures in C
    A lot of systems programming code is done in C, primarily because of the exposure of explicit memory addresses, but for other reasons too. ...
  • On brevity
    Concise and compact diction is an art that I appreciate more each day. A taste of brevity comes in savoring a phrase that captures an idea w...
  • Spacecraft Flight Software Workshop
    MMS: a NASA mission that will fly RTEMS Last week I attended the Workshop on Spacecraft Flight Software (FSW 2011) at the Johns Hopkins Uni...
  • Post 0
    I've been thinking about starting a blog for awhile, but unlike some of my compulsions, I actually followed through this time.  Although...
  • OT: Apple Pie
    The holidays really give me a hankering for pie.  I made some apple pies awhile back after going apple picking, and I took a couple photos. ...
  • Software product country of origin (COO)
    Late last year, US Customs ( CBP ) issued an advisory ruling regarding how to determine the COO for software products when software is deve...
  • Critical Bugs and Quality Assurance
    Sebastian Huber recently posted a nasty RTEMS bug and fix. While simple, the bug manifested in their application as an increase in one task...
  • Understanding Energy and Power
    Lately I've been looking at power as an evaluation metric for my research. Power consumption has always been an important design concer...

Categories

  • cerification
  • computer architecture
  • computer security
  • COO
  • cooking
  • gem5
  • git
  • government
  • GSoC
  • hacking
  • LaTeX
  • life
  • linux
  • lolcat
  • Lua
  • mentorsummit
  • OOP
  • open source software
  • rant
  • research
  • RTEMS
  • science
  • sisu
  • space
  • thesis
  • VC
  • visualization
  • work

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (12)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ▼  May (3)
      • Congratulations RTEMS GSoC 2013 Students
      • Who's calling me? Visualizing function callers
      • Software Licenses with RTEMS
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2012 (12)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
  • ►  2011 (29)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (19)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile